You can read it here: http://www.newsobserver.com/138/story/427221.html
What I really didn't understand about this story was this statement made by the director of the agency:
"We operated on faith that everyone was doing the right thing," he said. His agency is apparently not responsible for reimbursing the clients because it is a nonprofit that merely acted as a conduit for the government payments.
So my question is: Does being a non-profit absolve the agency of responsibility for oversight, accountability and management of its volunteers or associates?
Maybe I'm missing something.
Tell me what you think.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcomed!